Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Genocide Deniers

I found this interesting piece over Oliver Kamn. Oliver Kamn fisked Chomsky (and the Guardian) over his position in relation to the genocide in Bosnia. We all know about Chomsky infamous comment on the Cambodia Killing Field. Apparently he is taking a similar position with the genocide in Bosnia. And similar to the Killing Field comment, Chomsky said something outrageous and later denied ever saying it or claim that it was taken out of context. Noam Chomsky granted an interview to The Guardian last October and the interviewer supposedly asked some tought indirect questions about the masacre at Srebrenica.
Q: Do you regret supporting those who say the Srebrenica massacre was exaggerated?
A: My only regret is that I didn't do it strongly enough.
It is true that the above question- in exact wording- was never asked; and Chomsky never gave the answer - in exact wording. Therefore Chomsky is entitled to an apology and a correction from The Guardian on this specific fact. But Chomsky did indirectly support the position that Srebrenicia was not a masacre and there was no genocide in Bosnia. And as a public intellectual, he must be held responsible.
Oliver gave the evidence of Chomsky position in his piece and I strongly recommend readers to read the whole thing. It is long and laborious but worthy of your time. The summary of Oliver's article is that Chomsky by supporting Diana Johnstone's position is himself a genocide denier.
I will not address Chomsky sin which is merely an echo of Oliver Kamn's position. However I wish to address the original position of Dianna Johnstone which Chomsky supports. Dianna Johnston wrote "Fools' Crusade: Yugoslavia, Nato, and Western Delusions" which basically denies that there was a genocidal campaign in the Former Yugoslavia and it is minor in comparision to crimes commited by the US internationally. Of course, wacko leftist accusing the US of war crimes is not noteworthy in itself so I will not address that particular argument.
But I have been to Bosnia and am intimately familiar with that civil war. And I think it is important to debunk the Johnstone argument - not for the sake of the US but for the sake of the victims of that genocide. Oliver Kamn did a nice job summarizing Johnstone's thesis and in this post I will refute her argument. I am doing it in the names of the murdered, the raped, and the survivors. Oliver Kamn:
To summarise, this is what Johnstone argues: that there is “a difficulty in knowing the truth about Srebrenica”. This is partly because “uncertainty has persisted concerning the actual number of people killed, the circumstances and motives involved and the political significance of the real or assumed killing that took place.” Johnstone urges, therefore, that “a number of factors should be taken into account”.
These are:

1. The safe areas (including Srebrenica) were not demilitarised, but “served as Muslim military bases … safe bases from which to attack the Serbs”, and UN-protected food shipments were “suspected - correctly” by the Serbs of acting as a front for the shipment of weapons. The UN announcement of the demilitarisation of Srebrenica was “deceptive”.
2. The Muslim forces in Srebrenica were led by one Naser Oric who “had carried out murderous raids against nearby Serb villages”. Oric’s Muslim fighters beheaded the bodies of Serbs, reminding Serbs of the Ottoman occupation.
3. The Bosnian Muslim government pulled Oric’s men out of the enclave “deliberately leaving the enclave undefended”. This alleged fact “has aroused strong suspicion of a calculated sacrifice”. In addition, a former member of the Bosnian parliament has “insisted that many more Srebrenicans had survived than were acknowledged”.
4. The US used the “inevitable failure” of the UN safe area concept as a way of getting NATO to supplant the United Nations. “The UNPROFOR mission was a planned failure … used to discredit the whole tradition of neutral diplomacy” and colluded in by “Washington’s choice as Secretary General, Kofi Annan…”
5. “The number of Muslims killed or missing after the fall of Srebrenica is uncertain and more effort has been made to inflate the figures than to identify and count the real victims”. The original 8,000 figure was made up of 3,000 reported detainees and 5,000 who fled, of whom, according to one newspaper report, 3-4,000 had now turned up. Six years later “ICTY forensic teams had exhumed 2,361 bodies in the region and identified fewer than 50 … some of the bodies were certainly of Serbs as well as of Muslims”. Johnstone concludes that there is “no clear way to account for the fate of all the Muslim men reported missing in Srebrenica”, not least because some of the prisoners “were released in exchanges” or “even dispersed abroad”.
6. “The original accusation against the Bosnian Serbs was politically motivated.” Johnstone writes that “The accusation of a ‘Srebrenica massacre’ [note, these are Johnstone’s quotation marks] was used by the Clinton administration” to distract attention from Croat activities in the Krajina region, and on to “Serb misdeeds”. A presentation by Madeleine Albright of satellite photographs showing possibly massacre burial sites “successfully diverted attention” at the UN from the Croatian offensive against the Serbs. The photos themselves are problematic because “If … the massacres took place on the scale alleged, why were no photos displayed showing the massacres?”

7. “Insofar as Muslims were actually executed [note the use of the quasi-judicial word ‘executed’ rather than ‘murdered’ or even ‘killed’ here] following the fall of Srebrenica, such crimes bear all the signs of spontaneous acts of revenge rather than a project of ‘genocide’”. This is the context in which Johnstone claims that the separation of men of military age from women and children makes one thing obvious, “one does not commit ‘genocide’ by sparing women and children”. Johnstone claims that the separation actually happened “partly because the Serbs could exchange” Serb and Muslim POWs and partly because the Serbs were looking for Oric’s notorious killers. The rapid fall of the enclave “presented the Serbs with an opportunity to exact revenge”. Furthermore “some observers” think that the whole thing “was a ‘trap’ for the Serbs who stupidly fell into it.” In fact “one man who wanted to keep Bosnian Serb forces away from Srebrenica was Slobodan Milosevic”. He may have anticipated that “the accusation of ‘genocide’ in Srebrenica was used to construct the presumption that Milosevic was plotting to commit genocide in Kosovo.”
On point one and two, it has some kernels of truth but much more factual errors. There are still Muslim (Bosniaks) fighters within Srebrenicia proper - to include Naser Oric and his men - but the number is insignificant because the bulk of Bosniak fighters were defending Sarajevo. Srebrenicia location is deep within Serb controlled territory. I includes a map to familiar readers with the locations in this article. The greenline is the current border that divide Bosnia into The Federation and Republika Sprska. It was also the front line around the time of the fall of Srebrenica. The red lines are the main roads.
By the time of the seige of Srebrenica, the combined Serbian Army (JNA) and the Bosnian Serbs (VRS) forces already took Zvonik, a Muslim majority town north of Srebrenica and emptied it of all Muslims. Many of the refugee fled to Srebrenica, increased it population by at least five times. The JNA-VRS forces pushed further south and completely surrounded Srebrenica. Srebrenica was completely isolated and if one looks at the map, it is very far from the front line to be a viable base for launching attacks against the Serbs. Supplying in the city is virtually impossible without going through Serbs controlled checkpoint. The only way to avoid the checkpoints was on foot through the mountain. Having been there, I can tell you that the mountain in Bosnia is tough terrain to tranverse - one has to be in very good shape and if one carry light load. Johnstone's idea that the city was a forward base is absurd.
There is no denial that Naser Oric is a war criminal. I have personally met Naser Oric when I was a peacekeeper in Bosnia (2000) and my impression of him was negative. He is a typical criminal scumbag that profit from war. He was a sleazy night club owner in Tuzla at the time. When he was indicted, we came close to capturing him but he managed to evade.
But I wonder what Johnstone point in mentioning Naser Oric. Naser Oric role in the Srebrenica event was a negative one but irrelevant to the later masacre. Naser and his men, during the seige, went outside the city to forage for food and supply. In the process, they indiscriminately killed Serbs who live in the outskirt of the city. Robbery was his main motive. And as the Serbs were closing in the city, Naser and his men left in helicopter. Is Johnstone implying that Naser action justify the masacre later on by Serbs? According Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, who is no friend of Naser Oric, submitted a document to the UN that Naser Oric killed 371 Serbs during his raids (from 1993 - 1995). War crime no doubt; and he is being tried for it. But that fact bear no relevancy on the later masacre unless if Johnstone argue that it was spontaneous revenge - unqualified as premeditated and planned masacre.
Which she did in this article at the International Action Center (a far left center found by Ramsey Clark), which seems to be the summarized version of her book:
When the Bosnian Serb forces captured the town on July 11, 2005, civilians were clamoring to leave the enclave, understandably enough, since there was virtually no normal economic life there. Much has been made of the fact that Serb forces separated the population, providing buses for women, children and the infirm to take them to Tuzla, while detaining the men. In light of all that preceded, the reason for this separation is obvious: the Bosnian Serbs were looking for the perpetrators of raids on Serb villages, in order to take revenge.

However, only a relatively small number of Muslim men were detained at that point, and some of them are known to have survived and eventually been released in exchange for Serb prisoners. When the Serb forces entered the town from the south, thousands of Muslim soldiers, in disarray because of the absence of commanding officers, fled northwards, through wild wooded hills toward Tuzla. It is clear enough that they fled because they feared exactly what everyone aware of the situation dreaded: that Serb soldiers would take vengeance on the men they considered guilty of murdering Serb civilians and prisoners.
First of all, the revenge explanation does hold water. There was other masacres long before Srebrenica. There is a hotel in Zvornik that we nicknames "Airbone Hotel." When the Serbs took Zvornik, they took Muslims to a hotel on the Drina (the river that divides Bosnia and Serbia), killed them and threw their bodies into river - hence the nickname. There were so many bodies that the hydroelectric damn downstream was clogged. The refugees at Srebrenica include many survivors of Zvornik.
Johnstone assertion that Muslims men fled north toward Tuzla is absurd. It would normally took us most of the day to travel from Tuzla to Srebrenica in humvee using the main road. It would be almost impossible to travel from Srebrenica to Tuzla on foot while avoiding the main road. The numerous mountains in between make it physically impossible.
Johnstone had also never visited the mass grave in Bosnia. I went to many of them and they turned my stomach. So far more than 5,000 remains were recovered in and around Srebrenica and new ones are being found. It is a higher rate of recover than most masacres in the past suggesting the number maybe much higher than 8,000 originally estimated.
Throughout her book, Johnstone deliberately avoids mentioning the rapes that occured after the fall of Srebrenica. Beside seperating the men and young boy to be massacred, the Serbs raped many women and young girls as a form of intimidation.
Beside the factual errors on the Srebrenica Masacre, Johnstone has nothing to add to the topic other than crazy conspiracy theory. The fact that Croats and Bosniaks also commited war crimes is not disputed by anyone. It does not change the fact that the Serbs were the most prolific killers in the war because they were most well equiped. It further does not change that Srebrenica Masacre in 1995 was the worst masacre in Europe since World War Two. Dianna Johnstone book has less to do with Bosnia than with America. If the US did not intervened in that conflict, Johnstone would have no problem acknowleding the masacre. I am used to the nutty Leftist bashing the US. We can take the abuse. But it sadden me to see victims of genocide being denied of their stories in the process.


Blogger Srebrenica Genocide said...

There is a great blog about Srebrenica Genocide denial at:

9:32 PM  
Blogger Pedro said...

Minh-Duc, I just wanted to let you know again how much I learn from your writings. Thank you. You have so much to offer our national discourse and debate.

1:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Minh-Duc,

Sir,apart from acting as an apologist for Izetbegovic's Islamist Nazi warlord, Mr. Naser Oric,with your outrageous comment:

"Naser Oric role in the Srebrenica event was a negative one but irrelevant to the later masacre"

Irrelevant? Slaughtering several thousand Serbian men, women and children for three years running is "irrelevant"?

Sir,on the subject of the body count of Izetbegovic's troops killed in combat with the better trained Bosnian VRS Serbian army - which you and the other Bosnian "Srebrenica genocide" promoters claim as another WW2 style "holocaust"
you haven't provided a shred of evidence for any of your claims regarding the figure of 8,000 "or more".

Sir, one thing the Bosnian "Srebrenica genocide" promoters like you and the imbecilic, mentally deranged and incredibly puerile and disgustingly RUDE, Mr. Daniel Lam of Quebec,Canada, author of the racist and spurious pro-Nazi "Srebrenica Genocide blogspot" have forgotten is this:

The cardinal rule of logic and deductive reasoning:

One has to PROVE a claim being made with EVIDENCE. In other words one has to PROVE a "positive": one CANNOT prove a "negative".The burden of proof is on THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM.

Where is the actual EVIDENCE/PROOF that 8,000 "Bosniaks" were shot dead at close range as claimed by the Izetbegovic SDA Islamist lobby?

Has even ONE United Nations official - whom was there on the ground in Bosnia AT THE TIME of the alleged massacre - stepped forward to say - under oath - that he/she actually SAW the EVIDENCE of the 8,000 "Bosniaks" shot dead at close range?

NO. Not even ONE United Nations offical whom was there AT THE TIME has come forward to testify under oath that they saw evidence of even ONE SINGLE "Bosniak" shot dead at close range -"execution style".

Why? Because the bodies that were discovered were those of TROOPS who were SHOT DEAD IN COMBAT with the Bosnian Serb VRS Army and certainly NOT executed.

Have any doubts? Read the reports of United Nations officials and former journalists at the following URL:

Sir, there you will also find actual SUPPRESSED OFFICIAL UNITED NATIONS documents of the slaughter of approximately 3,870 innocent Serbian men,WOMEN and CHILDREN by the Islamist fundamentalist SDA Bosnian leader, Mr. Alija Izetbegovic, who commanded his Bosnian Islamist Nazi warlord, Mr. Naser Oric, to slaughter these innocent Serbian civilians with axes,knives,hammers,iron bars,fire and explosives from early 1992 right up until July 1995.

In other words, for THREE YEARS RUNNING whilst the UN top brass in New York and almost all of the Western media kept their mouths shut and covered the massacres up for political reasons (i.e., to gain control of the strategically and geopolitically vital Balkans peninsula - long coveted by Germany and both superpowers during the Cold War).

See for example:

Sir, by the way, in case you think I am some "nutty US hating Leftist" I happen to be a proud and patriotic expatriate traditional conservative Libertarian American of JEWISH DESCENT,who is against the international totalitarianism of the Globalists in the CFR, Trilateral Commission, PNAC, Bilderberg group, et al,who are attempting to destroy the REPUBLIC of the United States.

I am not fooled by those vicious hate filled racist people, like Mr. Daniel Lam,of Quebec Canada, who, because he has ZERO EVIDENCE to support his claims gets angry and frustrated when he is exposed as a LIAR and subsequently insists on sending me and other people imbecilic, puerile, VILE, DISGUSTING, PUBLIC TOILET STYLE OBSCENITIES via the comments section of my blog and Mr. Neil Craig's blog "A Place To Stand".

For evidence of Mr. Daniel Lam's disgusting and obnoxiously vile behavior,totally inappropriate for someone claiming to be "objective", please consult the following URLs:

also see:




Peter Robert North.

5:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Minh-Duc,

Thank you for taking time to write this. There are enough people out there who are more than willing to deny what happened in Bosnia during those years. In case Peter Robert North ever checks your webpage again .. Peter, shame on you!

The truth will survive. It always does.


12:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is anyone able to refute what Peter Robort North wrote, or is "shame on you" the best response anyone can muster?

4:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

After picking myself up from the floor after reading Minh-Duc's article, and rolling around in laughter; I must say this, first,

Peter North - HEAR, HEAR!!

Dzenana, IS THAT YOUR COME BACK ("Shame on you!) AGAINST HIS EVIDENTIAL SUPPORT?? Pathetic! Actaully, He's spot on!

Minh-Duc, I think you need your head examined? BTW , the "so-called" massacre didn't occur in 2005. maybe you should proof read before you post. There's already been enough propoganda. We don't need the Naive public thinking the Serbs committed another Serbophobia "so called massacre" in 2005!

Killing thousands of Serbs in the outlying villages had nothing to do with it?? No - not at all??!!

I'm sorry, but if I found my father's decapitated head with his genitals stuffed in his mouth, I'd want some payback as well.

So Dzenana, are you going to deny this occured in "those years"?? Come on suprise me!To bad you don't know what the truth is!


5:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You said you will love me wow gold the whole life, but WoW Gold you marry her. You said you will wow power leveling,come to marry me, but this will not be carried out forever.WoW Gold I am trying my best to forget you and do not love you anymore. wow leveling But I failed and I still love you. Maybe wow leveling she needs you more compared wow leveling with me. So I tell you that world of warcraft power leveling you should love world of warcraft power leveling her and take good world of warcraft leveling care of her. You said I was so of warcraft leveling Yes, because I love you,world of warcraft leveling I hope you will be power leveling happy forever.

5:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,美髮儀器,美髮,儀器,髮型,EMBA,MBA,學位,EMBA,專業認證,認證課程,博士學位,DBA,PHD,在職進修,碩士學位,推廣教育,DBA,進修課程,碩士學位,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,課程介紹,學分班,文憑,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,日式料理, 台北居酒屋,日本料理,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,台北結婚,場地,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,造型系列,學位,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,SEO,婚宴,捷運,學區,美髮,儀器,髮型,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,房子,捷運,學區,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,學位,碩士學位,進修,在職進修, 課程,教育,學位,證照,mba,文憑,學分班,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,場地,結婚,場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,場地,居酒屋,燒烤,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,小套房,小套房,進修,在職進修,留學,證照,MBA,EMBA,留學,MBA,EMBA,留學,進修,在職進修,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,关键词排名,网络营销,網路行銷,關鍵字排名,关键词排名,网络营销,PMP,在職專班,研究所在職專班,碩士在職專班,PMP,證照,在職專班,研究所在職專班,碩士在職專班,SEO,廣告,關鍵字,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,網頁設計,網站設計,網站排名,搜尋引擎,網路廣告,SEO,廣告,關鍵字,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,網頁設計,網站設計,網站排名,搜尋引擎,網路廣告,SEO,廣告,關鍵字,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,網頁設計,網站設計,網站排名,搜尋引擎,網路廣告,SEO,廣告,關鍵字,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,網頁設計,網站設計,網站排名,搜尋引擎,網路廣告,EMBA,MBA,PMP


11:24 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Tlie cook, even if shape ups boots she have a kitchen-maid under her, must never neglect to Me that the larder ii kep clean, and that no unwholesome smells arise from dropping of meat, or gravies, milk, Ac. The leaves c vegetable* left to skechers shape ups ferment must also produce exhalations detrimental, especially in hot weather, to all moia> food.Soups, gravies, and milk should each bo put daily into clean vessels: unless this be done, they will soon begin to change. If soup or gravies are not immediately wanted fur use, they should be boiled up, and then •trained into cold vessels, and put into the coolest place to be found till they are wanted. All vegetable sub* skechers shoes •lances should be strained from them.1566. In second-rate establishments the housekeeper usually superintends the higher branches of cooking, and the cook undertakes the minor duties of the kitchen-maid, either with or without the assistance of a scullion.1567. The cook engages in small establishments, varying from three to fiv** in number, to perform the whole of the work in the kitchen, and in some places shape ups skechers portions of housework; she has also to clean the hall, passages, stone entrance, stcr»s, and kitchen stairs, and occasionally the dining-room, or the whole of the ground floor. It is apparent that, with this variety of occupation, she must require method as well as activity, or ahe will be hampered and hurried, and perhaps perform no part of her duty well. Method must be her law ; and it consists in a judicious division of her weekly, as well as of her duily work, shape ups and to her regular adherence to this division, performing in its appointed time each portion of her duty. It may be useful to give a detailed account both of the day's and week's routine of her business, to show how even this variety of household shape ups shoes work may be easily and well performed.156t*. First. The routine of the dm/x work. Early in the morning, the kitchen grate or stove, oven, and boiler must be cleaned, the lire lighted, und the water set on for breakfast.

7:10 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

When floods do occur, The North Face Sale the water, though turbid for the time, subsides rapidly and soon becomes clear again. Below Hertford, floods are liable to act injuriously, the water remaining longer on the adjoining marsh lands. Mr. Beardmore stated that heavy floodings had taken place in May 1824, in November 1852, and in October 1857, and that at such times large areas of land were, laid under water for several days. Skechers Shoes The marsh-lands on both sides of the lower Thames are not subject to such flooding, as the embankments are found to be sufficient to shut out the tides, and the primitive sewers, marsh-ditches, and tidal outlet-sluices regulate the delivery of flood waters so as to prevent injury to land. The marsh districts on both sides of the lower Lee are now subject to the double evil of flooding and droughts; during long continued dry weather the surface cracks until there are fissures several feet in depth. Flood water is passed much more rapidly down the valley of the Lee in consequence The North Face Sale of the improvements made of late years in the navigation by dredging the channels. Much, however, remains to be done which would improve the conditions of the marsh-land and the health of the people.The evidence as to the water-mills proves that in many instances the dams and ponds act injuriously by preventing land drainage and impeding floods. However useful Discount G Star Sale water-power may have been in former times, when these mills were first established, that use has now been greatly reduced in relative value, and, wherever there is sufficient trade to The North Face Sale make grinding corn a profitable occupation, steam-power has to be brought in as an auxiliary, the improved navigation and railway accommodation facilitating the delivery of coals so as to give an advantage to steam over the constantly alternating and uncertain flow of water. Water-power having diminished in commercial value, and land for agricultural purposes having greatly increased in value, injury to the adjoining lands may be shown to cause an annual money loss to the district Shape Ups Boots. To this money loss must be added injury to health by the retention of large areas of undrained land. Water-mills and mill-dams are proved to be injurious to local properties, but we have no evidence as to any serious pollutions being caused by these mills, other than so far as they cause a partial stagnation in the water and accumulations of mud by ponding.

1:55 AM  
Anonymous wow gold said...

I agree with the above mentioned Eden Eternal Review.I just tried out as you suggested Eden Eternal Goldand it works great Thank you so much.
Buy tera gold

11:21 PM  
Anonymous QHYAPPLE said...

This is a very interesting blog and so i like to visit your blog again and again.

This cheapest wow gold store is dedicated to serving MMORPG wow gold cheap gamers around the World,so you can enjoy more time doing what you actually enjoy in the wow gold game, and leave the grinding to us. Let us help you play the game on YOUR style! In order to provide a better service to all our customers, The price of cheap wow gold is nice.we aim to exceed your expectations and guarantee in safe way.

10:18 PM  
Anonymous Subing said...

|RS Gold|Tera Gold
|cheap tera gold|buy tera gold
|wow gold|

12:58 AM  
Anonymous RS Gold said...

Thank you for sharing. Glad to see you.It is really a good post.








6:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mister, something RS Goldthe particular Bosnian "Srebrenica genocide" promoters as you as well as the imbecilic, in your mind deranged and intensely puerile and disgustingly RUDE, Mr. Daniel Lam associated with Quebec, canada ,,Canada, author from the racist as wellWOW Gold as unfounded pro-Nazi "Srebrenica Genocide blogspot" get forgotten about is:

7:41 PM  
Anonymous lollever said...

he fact that Croats and Bosniaks also commited war crimes is not disputed by anyone. It does not change the fact that the Serbs were the most prolific killers in the war because they were most well equipedCheap LOL Boost
Cheap LOL Elo Boost

11:27 PM  
Anonymous five nights at freddy's demo said...

I like it very much,very good post.
facebook movil | five nights at freddy's | facebook movil gratis

12:50 AM  
Anonymous jogos de friv said...

Thank you for sharing information.
i like play game click jogos online free and play game juegos pou

12:11 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

In this way, Fortnite feels like a more accomplished version of Bungie's Destiny, a match that ambitiously tried and buy fortnite weapons never quite succeeded at blending the best of shooter and MMO game layout. Much like Destiny, Fortnite lets players engage in a shared world, customize characters, and, now, upgrade those customization choices through in-game pursuits. But unlike Bungie, Epic puts its world-building and other update attempts toward the multiplayer battle royale mode, without worrying too much about a traditional plot or story. Since Fortnite is free-to-play, players do not anticipate anything away from the center experience, and they pay money only for cosmetic vanity fortnite items and nothing else.

1:05 AM  
Blogger Bale said...

It's hard to say that I haven't bought Madden Overdrive Coins on this website. You can search for Madden Mobile Coins on Google. There are a lot of websites for sale. I have been buying it at MMOAH. This is recommended by a friend who likes to play games. I think the biggest advantage of buying Madden NFL Overdrive Coins on their website is security. I haven't had any problems since I bought it. I trust this website.

12:20 AM  
Blogger shivani said...

A bewildering web journal I visit this blog, it's unfathomably heavenly. Oddly, in this present blog's substance made purpose of actuality and reasonable. The substance of data is informative
Oracle Fusion Financials Online Training
Oracle Fusion HCM Online Training
Oracle Fusion SCM Online Training

4:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home